The Challenge Against America’s Bureaucratic Mandarins
Favicon bianco

The Challenge Against America’s Bureaucratic Mandarins

BREAKING NEWS

NEWSLETTER

Houston, March 20, 2025 – In the modern era, American bureaucracy stands as an imposing monolith, an intricate labyrinth of regulations and procedures that seem to resist any attempt at reform. In this context, two figures emerge as protagonists of an epic battle: former President Donald Trump and visionary entrepreneur Elon Musk. Their mission? To challenge the bureaucratic apparatus and introduce unprecedented efficiency into the federal government.

The Birth of DOGE: An Acronym, A Mission

During the 2024 election campaign, Trump promised to reduce public spending and streamline the government machine. From a conversation with Musk emerged the idea of creating the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a temporary organization with the declared objective of eliminating waste and inefficiencies in the federal government.

Despite its grandiose name, DOGE is not an official government department but an entity created to operate under the aegis of the United States Digital Service, with Musk at the helm.

The Action Plan: Cuts and Restructuring

From its early days, DOGE has taken decisive action. Entire departments have undergone review, with thousands of federal employees laid off in an attempt to reduce public spending. Musk justified these moves by emphasizing the need to eliminate entrenched inefficiencies and promote a culture of efficiency within the government. However, these actions have sparked criticism both within and outside the state apparatus, with accusations of excessive aggressiveness and disregard for established institutions.

Resistance and Legal Challenges

The bureaucratic reaction was swift. Many officials expressed concern about DOGE’s radical approach, seeing its actions as a threat to the stability and continuity of public services. Additionally, several lawsuits have been filed against DOGE’s decisions, questioning the constitutional legitimacy of its actions. A striking example is the temporary suspension of the closure of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by a federal judge, who raised concerns about the constitutionality of DOGE’s maneuvers.

Musk’s Role: Innovator or Disruptor?

Elon Musk, known for revolutionizing industries such as automotive and space exploration, now finds himself at the center of a heated debate. On one hand, supporters see him as the right man to bring a wave of innovation and pragmatism to government. On the other, critics accuse him of failing to understand the complexities of the public sector and adopting an overly corporate approach in a context that requires balance and political sensitivity.

The Trap of Trust

The inability of governments to reduce unnecessary public employees, allowing them to coast along until retirement, erodes trust in central institutions and creates a class of privileged officials, regardless of merit, at the expense of businesses. In practice, this is a disguised form of basic income. This phenomenon, known as the “trust trap,” can lead to legalism and moral hazard practices, undermining the effectiveness of public policies.

Conclusion: A Battle Still Unfolding

The challenge posed by Trump and Musk against American bureaucracy is far from over. While DOGE continues its restructuring efforts, internal resistance and legal battles pose significant obstacles. It remains to be seen whether this attempt at bureaucratic revolution will lead to a leaner, more efficient government or collide with the inertia of a system deeply rooted for decades.

In Evidence

For years, a powerful and pervasive narrative has shaped our professional ambitions: success is an impeccable suit, tailored with flawless results, linear career paths, and...
For years, a powerful and pervasive narrative has shaped our professional ambitions: success is an impeccable suit, tailored with flawless results, linear career paths, and...